By Alyssa Heath (A_Heath_Elliott), Head of EU and UK policy, PRI

Alyssa Heath

The European Union has led the globe in sustainable finance reforms. But despite, this, capital markets remain unsustainable. The implications for European savers and citizens are profound. The revised sustainable finance strategy is a generational opportunity – to put in place guidance, tools and regulation; to remove barriers; to realign Europe’s capital markets with sustainability objectives; and to work urgently with governments and investors beyond Europe’s borders. That this should be achieved is not inevitable. It requires concerted action from governments, policymakers, investors and companies.

To support the success of this strategy, the PRI makes the following overarching recommendations:

1. The revised strategy should provide a clear, ambitious and compelling vision of the finance industry of the future, aligned with the Paris Agreement and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

For example, a system where EU citizens’ long-term savings and investments are fully resilient to future sustainability shocks and can be aligned with their values, where institutional investors systematically track, measure and optimise the outcomes (positive and negative) from investment activity, and where a vibrant and flourishing market for sustainable products enables a race to the top between providers. Many of the building blocks for a sustainable financial system already exist, developed through the existing Action Plan on Sustainable Finance. What is missing is how they relate to the long-term vision for the sector, and to each other.

2. It must build from a strong foundation

In some cases, implementation of the existing Action Plan is falling short. The PRI has contributed extensively to initiatives such as the EU Taxonomy, the Disclosure Regulation and the Non-Financial Reporting Directive, but we are concerned that these initiatives are developing in isolation from each other and in places are not based on an adequate understanding of investment practice.

Further sustainable finance measures should also be carefully prioritised. This consultation covers a huge array of potential topics, many of which are different approaches to the same fundamental questions around risk, impact and disclosure. Finally, the new strategy must also accurately reflect the tools investors have to create change. It must move away from the assumption that the impact of an investment strategy is the same as the characteristics of the underlying portfolio, and instead support and develop the full range of tools investors have available to influence real-economy outcomes, including capital allocation, stewardship and real-economy policy engagement.

3. Sustainable finance must be central to a green recovery

As Europe begins to emerge from the COVID-19 pandemic, investors have signalled deep support for Europe’s green recovery, and many are considering the role they can play. The proposed EUR 1.8 trillion recovery package will shape Europe’s economy in the coming decades. The Sustainable Finance Action Plan must also work alongside the green recovery and contribute to the Sustainable Development Goals. Central to this, we see the EU Taxonomy – expanded to include social issues – as a tool to enable investors, issuers, policymakers and other stakeholders to work together in pursuit of a sustainable and equitable European economy, true to the original vision of the High Level Expert Group on Sustainable Finance.

4. The EU must work towards international ambition and greater harmonisation

The EU’s action will resonate around the world, and will set a standard for a global financial framework aligned with sustainability. As a first mover, Europe will benefit – but must also work with other willing countries, and investors around the world, to develop international applications. Many investors operate across the globe, and many EU sustainable finance regulations, such as the EU Taxonomy or the SFRD, require investors to disclose information about the sustainability risks and impacts of their investments irrespective of where the investees are. There is a clear and urgent need for harmonisation of corporate and investor disclosure requirements and taxonomies which can support the implementation of the Paris Agreement and the SDGs.

See the PRI’s full response to the European Commission consultation on the renewed sustainable finance strategy here.



This blog is written by PRI staff members and guest contributors. Our goal is to contribute to the broader debate around topical issues and to help showcase some of our research and other work that we undertake in support of our signatories.

Please note that although you can expect to find some posts here that broadly accord with the PRI’s official views, the blog authors write in their individual capacity and there is no “house view”. Nor do the views and opinions expressed on this blog constitute financial or other professional advice.

If you have any questions, please contact us at [email protected].