Organisations voluntarily sign and commit to the Principles for Responsible Investment. The PRI Initiative works with signatories to further the implementation of the Principles. It does this by providing guidance, facilitating collaboration, engaging with signatories and wider stakeholders.
The PRI Initiative’s integrity is dependent both on the actions of the Initiative and collective commitment and good efforts of PRI signatories to the PRI Initiative, its objects, and the implementation of the Principles.
The Serious violations policy is one means to safeguard the reputation, integrity and good efforts of the PRI and its signatories. Other means include annual reporting and transparency requirements of the Reporting and Assessment Framework, and the signatory minimum requirements.
The Signatory rules state that the Board has authority to terminate signatory status:
Signatory status will cease… Upon the signatory being notified that the Board has determined, by way of a majority vote of the Board that its signatory status shall cease because the Board believes the behaviour of the signatory puts the integrity of the Initiative at risk.
This policy sets out for the PRI Board, Executive and Signatories a formal process and criteria to reference when there is an allegation of a serious violation to the integrity of the PRI Initiative and its objects, the Principles, and the good efforts of its signatories. The aim is also to provide assurance to signatories and stakeholders that there is a process and predictable response to a serious violation.
The PRI Board, by way of a majority vote of the PRI Board, has the authority to delist a signatory if the Board believes the behaviour of the signatory puts the integrity of the Initiative at risk. The PRI Board can delegate the investigation, recommendations, and monitoring of any scenario within this policy to a PRI Board sub-committee or other suitable body. The final decision(s) to engage, monitor and / or delist resides with the PRI Board.
Serious violations of the integrity of the Initiative (‘serious violation’) typically include, but are not limited to, actions by a signatory or group of signatories that:
put the integrity of the PRI Initiative and its objects, the Principles and the commitment and good efforts of its signatories to the PRI Initiative, its objects, and the implementation of the Principles at risk;
are serious (material and / or significant);
are systematic (organised and / or an outcome of an organisation’s culture); and
are within the legitimate sphere of control of the signatory.
The PRI will not involve itself in any way in any claims of a legal nature that a party may have against a participating company or vice versa. Similarly, the measures set out within the policy are not intended to affect, pre-empt, or substitute for other regulatory or legal procedures or proceedings in any jurisdiction.
Raising an allegation
The PRI Executive can raise an allegation of a serious violation for the consideration of the PRI Board; or
any organisation can raise an allegation of a serious violation to the PRI Executive.
Complainants must frame their complaint within the criteria listed above and the burden of proof is on the complainant.
The role of the PRI Executive is to conduct an initial review to decide if the complaint is substantive, falls within the remit of the policy, and or if there is a relevant historical precedent. If the complaint is considered to be not substantive or outside of the remit of the policy, the party raising the matter will be so informed and no further action will be taken on the matter by the PRI Executive. For courtesy reasons, the matter will nevertheless be shared with the signatory concerned.
A complaint that it is substantive and within the remit of the policy will be sent to the signatory in question, with the right of first reply. After the signatory reply has been received the Board will decide whether it is a serious violation. If it is a serious violation then the Board will decide either to formally engage with the signatory, monitor and / or delist the signatory.
If the participating signatory refuses to engage with the PRI after an allegation of a serious violation within two months of first being contacted by the PRI Board the signatory will be delisted.
It is the Board’s decision to engage with and / or monitor a signatory that has been accused, or admitted guilt or received a legal sanction for a serious violation. A typical engagement will comprise of a formal letter from the PRI to the signatory:
noting that the actions appear to be a serious violation;
asking the signatory to respond to the allegations, and where relevant outline corrective measures, and to state their continued commitment to the Principles; and
informing the signatory that the PRI will monitor the situation.
Delisting a signatory for a serious violation is a last resort measure after engagement. In typical circumstances the Board will not delist a signatory unless there has been an admission of guilt or legal sanction. A signatory can choose to voluntarily delist after an alleged serious violation or admission of guilt or legal sanction. Any organisation that is delisted for a serious violation cannot re-apply for signatory status until two calendar years have elapsed since the date of delisting.
The PRI Board will disclose, via the PRI website, that it has decided to formally engage with, monitor or delist a signatory whose behaviour it considers puts the integrity of the Initiative at risk. The PRI Board will disclose the formal engagement letter to the signatory and the formal response (if it has decided to formally engage with, monitor or delist a signatory).
For further information see the
To contact the PRI about the policy or the process please contact email@example.com.
- PDF, Size 0.16 mb